這類題材久違了,只能說電影市場(chǎng)給觀眾給寵壞了,沒辦法去看一個(gè)演員的表演和需要反省的那些故事,哪怕不是很乏味的東西,我們也不能接受。
自己的狀態(tài)是拿起DVD,放下,丟掉,拿起,再丟掉,反復(fù)一個(gè)禮拜,下午看完了。看完想想十年前,那時(shí)候覺得自己有看不完的故事,享受不完的好電影,現(xiàn)在......,昨天看到中央臺(tái)在放與狼共舞,直接無視,人呢,墮落了。
電影中段有點(diǎn)乏味,總體很不錯(cuò),感想的話,法律凌駕與一切之上,那是理想,如果哪個(gè)國(guó)家能實(shí)現(xiàn)的話,那就是理想之國(guó)。
幾次要落淚。我覺得電影刻意沒有完全表現(xiàn)出整個(gè)事件的艱難和當(dāng)事人的痛苦與折磨,也許是為了不煽情隱忍的拍攝手法吧。十二年,失去了與孩子們共處的時(shí)光,失去了體面的工作,最愛的妻子,十二年間的榮譽(yù)和尊嚴(yán),還有也許這十二年間如果能夠足夠?qū)P亩l(fā)明的其他東西,以及也許可以繼續(xù)做為教授教書育人而延續(xù)的社會(huì)作用。十二年間失去的心智,新添的白發(fā),經(jīng)歷了近乎要瘋狂的精神折磨,誰也無法預(yù)知,失去的十二年時(shí)光要怎么樣用有限的金錢來衡量。平和的內(nèi)心,美好的生活,幸福的時(shí)光都永遠(yuǎn)無法換回了
(一)
in 1963, the first modern intermittent wipers were invented by Robert Kearns, an engineering professor at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan.
The road to intermittent wipers began earlier, on his wedding night in 1953, when an errant champagne cork shot into Kearn's left eye, which eventually went almost completely blind.
Nearly a decade later, Kearns was driving his Ford Galaxie through a light rain, and the constant movement of the wiper blades irritated his already troubled vision. He got to thinking about the human eye, which has its own kind of wiper, the eyelid, that automatically closes and opens every few seconds.
Finally in 1963, Kearns put his idea into action, building the first intermittent wiper system using off-the-shelf electronic components. Kearns showed it to the Ford Motor Company, and proposed manufacturing the design.
(二)
根據(jù)間歇性雨刷發(fā)明家Robert Kerns與福特長(zhǎng)達(dá)12年專利權(quán)訴訟真實(shí)事例改編而成的小說。Kerns在1963年發(fā)明該雨刷,雖申請(qǐng)專利但仍被福特設(shè)計(jì)盜用,此后二十多年他都投身于捍衛(wèi)專利權(quán)的官司中,涉及福特、克萊斯勒、通用、奔馳等汽車巨頭。
他為了讓家庭過上富足的生活,由大學(xué)講師轉(zhuǎn)型為發(fā)明家和制造業(yè)者,發(fā)明并計(jì)劃制造間歇性雨刷。在專利侵犯訴訟官司開始后不久,不得已與育有6個(gè)子女的妻子離婚,并將整個(gè)下半生投入專利侵權(quán)官司中。在十多年的訴訟過程中,福特曾多次以豐厚賠償利誘私下要求和解,始終遭到Kerns拒絕。
堅(jiān)持是一把雙刃劍,它換來了尊重,也刺痛了包容,贏得了勝利,也撕碎了生活。
感謝所有改善和美化生活的發(fā)明家,我永遠(yuǎn)會(huì)為他們投上支持的一票。
Justice comes at a price. It’s never granted.
So whenever you find yourself being treated with unjust, you need to consider the cost of both sides. To fight for justice, or to turn the page and forget about it.
We all want justice, but would you take 12 years of your life, your job, your friendship and your entire family’s happiness in exchange for it?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not tryibg to tell you what is the right choice and what is wrong.
“天才閃光”堅(jiān)持是一把雙刃劍
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明網(wǎng)址: http://www.cslcr.org/archives/id-23924.html